09:41:08
Investigate with evidence. Not guesses.
Turn a failing state into a structured diagnosis. Keep observed facts separate from ranked hypotheses, with every claim tied to its evidence.
One incident. A traceable sequence.
09:41:12
Previous container log collected
evidence: pod/logs#209:41:16
Missing configuration key observed
evidence: pod/logs#309:41:21
Diagnosis ready for operator review
sample hypothesisOne clear view of the problem.
Kubernetes diagnostics
Read pod status, events, and previous logs through a client with no mutating methods. Every observation is cited.
Log analysis
Group noisy streams, surface the first occurrence, and keep secrets out of the evidence trail.
Terraform plan explainer
Translate a plan into creates, replacements, and deletions, with destructive changes called out before apply.
Follow the evidence, not the guess.
payments-api · CrashLoopBackOff
Demo fixture / replay sequence
Three steps. No guesswork.
A calm, repeatable workflow for getting from a noisy incident to a next step you can trust.
Choose a surface
Start with a live Kubernetes cluster or a labelled demo fixture. No write credentials are required.
Collect evidence
The read-only client gathers observed facts and links each one to the resource and payload behind it.
Review the diagnosis
Review cited next steps and ranked hypotheses. Generated infrastructure changes are proposals only and are never applied.
Bring a failing pod. Leave with evidence.
Kubernetes diagnostics, log analysis, CI/CD investigation, Terraform explanations, Prometheus metrics, runbooks, the assistant, audit, and proposal-only infrastructure code are available now.
Built for calmer on-call.
Did the evidence match reality?
We compare the cited observations with what the operator saw during the incident, including the facts that were missing.
What was missing from the diagnosis?
The next adapter, rule, or evidence source should come from a real gap, not a roadmap guess.
Would you page with it?
We will publish a named result only after a design partner uses the product on real incidents and agrees to share it.
Helpful by design. In control by default.
Read-only by default
Investigations gather evidence without writing back to connected infrastructure.
Proposal-only changes
Generated infrastructure changes are never written or applied by the product.
Auditable decisions
Keep a record of investigation decisions and the evidence behind them.
Integration surfaces
Adapter availability depends on deployment configuration
Meet your infrastructure where it is.
Questions,
answered.
The short answers below are the same ones the code enforces. If something here contradicts what you find in the repo, the repo wins.
No. The model has no tools, shell, or network access. The backend collects allowlisted read-only evidence first, then asks the model to explain that evidence. There is no code path from model output to a command or infrastructure change.
Bring a failing state. Leave with evidence.
Start with read-only Kubernetes diagnostics or explore the product surfaces.